The role of pragmatic information in quantum mechanics and the quantum-classical transition
JUAN ROEDERER
University of Alaska-Fairbanks
 

I will show how an objective definition of the concept of information and the consideration of recent results about information-processing in the human brain help clarify some fundamental and often counter-intuitive aspects of quantum mechanics. In particular, I will discuss entanglement, teleportation, non-interaction measurements and decoherence in the light of the fact that pragmatic information, the one our brain handles, can only be defined in the classical macroscopic domain; it does not operate in the quantum domain. This justifies viewing quantum mechanics as a discipline dealing with mathematical models and procedures aimed exclusively at predicting the possible macroscopic changes and their likelihood that a given quantum system may cause when it interacts with its environment, including man-made devices such as measurement instruments. I will discuss the informational and neurobiological reasons of why counter-intuitive aspects arise whenever we attempt to construct mental images of the “inner workings” of a quantum system by forcing the concepts of classical information and time into the quantum domain; in this context I will examine the role of pragmatic information as a discriminator in the quantum-to-classical transition.

References
Adler, S. L. 2007. Lower and upper bounds on CSL parameters from latent image formation and IGM heating. J. Phys. A: Math. and Theor. 40: 2935-2957.
Balter, M. 2010. Did working memory spark creative culture? Science 328: 160–163.
Bickerton, D. 1995. Language and Human Behavior. Seattle,WA: University of Washington Press.
Bouwmeester, D.; Pan J. W.; Mattle, K.; Eibl, M.; Weinfurter, H.; and Zeilinger, A. 1997. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390(6660): 575-579.
Cho, A. 2010. The first quantum machine. Science 330: 1604.
Elitzur, A. C. and Vaidman, L. 1993. Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurement. Found. of Phys. 23: 987-997.
Han, C. J.; OTuathaigh, C. M.; van Trigt, L.; Quinn, J. J.; Fanselau, M. S.; Mongeau, R.; Koch, C.; and Anderson, D. J. 2003. Trace but not delay fear conditioning requires attention and the anterior cingulated cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(22): 13087-13092.
Hackermüller, L.; Hornberger, K., Brezger, B.; Zeilinger, A.; and Arndt, M. 2004. Decoherence of matter waves by thermal emission of radiation. Nature 427: 711-714.
Küppers, B.-O. 1990. Information and the Origin of Life. Cambridge, Mass.: TheMIT Press.
Kocsis, S.; Braverman, B.; Ravets, S.; Stevens, M. J.; Mirin, R. P.; Shalm, L. K.; and Steinberg, A. M. 2011. Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer. Science 332: 1170-1173.
Roederer, J. G. 1978. On the relationship between human brain functions and the foundations of physics. Found. of Phys. 8: 423-438.
Roederer, J. G. 2005. Information and its Role in Nature. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Roederer, J. G. 2010. “Bad habits” in quantum mechanics. Quantum Informatics for Cognitive, Social and Semantic Processes. Papers of the 2010 AAAI Fall Symposium.